Akta Perihal Dagangan (Akta ), Peraturan-Peraturan dan Perintah- Perintah & Trade Descriptions Act (Act ), Regulations and Orders ( Hingga. (PERAKUAN DAN PENANDAAN HALAL) AKTA PERIHAL DAGANGAN [Akta ], Menteri membuat perintah yang berikut. PERINTAH PERIHAL DAGANGAN (TAKRIF HALAL) PADA menjalankan kuasa yang diberikan oleh seksyen 28 Akta Perihal Dagangan.
|Published (Last):||7 October 2007|
|PDF File Size:||12.25 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.82 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Infringement – Allegation of – Whether proved – Whether plaintiffs had discharged burden to prove copying on similarities between their lanterns and those installed by defendants – Whether lantern eligible for copyright protection if reproduced more than 50 times – Copyright Acts. Appearance – Conditional appearance – Leave to enter conditional appearance out of time – Defendant domiciled in Port Lincoln, Australia – Whether submitted to jurisdiction – Whether having special circumstance to enter appearance – Whether to fully disclose previous related proceedings – Leave not endorsed on memorandum of conditional appearance – Whether oversight on part of Senior Assistant Registrar – Whether defendant required to serve memorandum of conditional appearance on plaintiff – Rules of the High CourtO.
Registered design – Infringement – Ownership of industrial design – Whether there was infringement of industrial design – Damages – Whether intellectual property rights vested pursuant to contract entered between parties – Industrial Designs Acts. Judgments and orders – Setting aside – Senior Assistant Registrar granted leave to defendant to enter memorandum of conditional appearance – Defendant domiciled in Port Lincoln, Australia – Whether submitted to jurisdiction – Whether defendant had special circumstance for entering appearance out of time – Whether defendant required to fully disclose previous related proceedings – Leave not endorsed on memorandum of conditional appearance – Whether oversight on part of Senior Assistant Registrar – Whether defendant required to serve memorandum of conditional appearance on plaintiff – Rules of the High CourtO.
Trade Descriptions Act Each agency is authorized by the respective statute and enactment in enforcing the regulation and law on halal goods and products. National Wages Consultative Council Act Keywords Consumer, law, halal, foods product, syariah.
Akta Perihal Dagangan Archives – BikesRepublic
Employment – Termination of employment – Termination before expiry of 5-year fixed term employment contract – Whether termination constituted dismissal with just cause and excuse – Whether termination in accordance with mutually agreed termination clause – Whether Industrial Court correct in holding dismissal with just cause and excuse – Whether judicial review application to be dismissed Chin Chun Yean v.
This website has been updated to the best of our knowledge to be accurate. Ranjit Singh Jit Singh. Guarantee – Notice of demand – Whether plaintiff’s letter of demand only an identification document – Whether converted into a court exhibit – Whether plaintiff could rely on document to prove that proper demand was made – Statement of account, whether sent to 4 th defendant.
Action – Limitation – Issue of – Claim for damages – Applicant’s failure to deliver vacant possession within prescribed period – Section 16N 2 b Housing Developers Control And Licensing Act – Interpretation and import – Whether could override time-barred limitation on s.
However, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia shall not be liable for any loss or daggangan caused by the usage of any information obtained from this web site. User Username Password Remember me. Abstract The enforcement agency is one of the bodies that responsible dagxngan the issue of halal. Then this paper will analyze the procedures and statutory provisions as to see whether all the processes and current legislations are protecting the consumers on halal food consumption. Shares – Acquisition and disposal of – Approval of Ministry of Finance or Bank Negara Malaysia – Plaintiff and defendant joint owners of subject company – Plaintiff purchasing over shares of company from defendant – Application by plaintiff to compel defendant to give written consent and further information to Ministry of Finance and Bank Negara Malaysia – Whether ‘option clause’ illegal – ‘Approval in principle’, whether already given by Bank Negara Malaysia – Refusal of defendant to reveal clarification given by Bank Negara Malaysia, significance of – Whether proceedings should be stayed for matter to be referred to arbitration – Whether there are issues in dispute – Arbitration Acts.
Chin Chun Yean v. Restricted Residence Repeal Bill The enforcement agency is one of the bodies that responsible for the issue of halal. Dabangan of statutory provisions, the finding of this paper is based on interviews with the enforcement agencies of halal products. Appeal – Appeal against conviction and sentence – Finding by Sessions Court Judge that respondent raped victim – Finding based on credibility of witnesses – Other facts taken into 201 consistent with Judge’s findings – Whether Sessions Court Judge correct in finding that prosecution had proven its case beyond reasonable doubt.
Penal Code – Section – Outraging modesty – Appeal against conviction and sentence – Evidence of child witness – Competency and corroboration – Whether conviction unsafe – Whether there was misdirection leading to failure of justice – Evidence Acts. Agreement – Finance agreement – Whether valid – Alleged irregularities in sale and purchase agreement – Whether validity of finance agreement affected – Whether irrelevant to appellants’ obligation under financing agreement – Whether appellants remained liable under financing agreements.
Not Yet In Force. Mohd Hanafi Ramly v. Judicial review – Certiorari – Housing tribunal, award of – Tribunal awarding house buyers damages for late delivery of vacant possession – Whether Tribunal had misconstrued law – Whether claim for damages time-barred – Rules of the High CourtO.
Pelaksanaan Dan Penguatkuasaan Halal Di Malaysia | Badarulzaman | Sains Humanika
This paper focuses on the perijal of the enforcement agencies pertaining to halal matters. Judicial review – Decision of Industrial Court – Premature termination of fixed term employment contract with just cause and excuse – Whether termination in accordance with mutually agreed termination clause – Whether judicial review application to be dismissed Chin Chun Yean v. Firstly, the jurisdiction of enforcement agencies will be discussed throughout this paper.
Cap dagangan – Permohonan perintah perihal dagangan – Perlanggaran cap perinal dalam perjalanan perdagangan – Cap dagangan berdaftar “Squiggles” bagi barangan roti – Sama ada penggunaan cap “Squiggle” oleh perayu bagi barangan rotinya melanggar cap dagangan berdaftar “Squiggles” – Sama ada perintah perihal dagangan boleh diberikan – Sama ada perintah perihal dagangan boleh diberikan terus secara ex parte – Sama ada terdapat penggunaan suci hati cap dagangan berdaftar dalam tempoh statutori yang ditetapkan – Sama ada perintah bagi penghapusan cap dagangan berdaftar boleh diberikan – Sama ada perayu seorang terkilan – Sama ada tarikh penggunaan sesuatu cap dagangan oleh seseorang pengguna berdaftar boleh dikuatkuasakan kebelakangan – Akta Perihal Dagangans.
Sharikat Permodalan Kebangsaan Bhd v. Shyam Ishta Puthucheary v. Mukim – Kuala Lumpur.
National Sports Institute Act Adverse inference – Non calling of material witness – Witness arrested together with accused not called by prosecution in drug case – Whether gap caused in prosecution’s case – Whether adverse inference should be invoked – Evidence Acts. Agreement – Finance agreement – Appellants obtained end financing from respondents for purchase of apartments – Allegation of sale and purchase agreement void in law – Whether consequently, the financing agreement appellants signed with respondents void and of no effect – Whether duty on respondents to ensure SPA free from legal infirmities – Whether SPA and financing agreement two distinct and separate contracts – Whether finance agreement valid regardless of alleged illegality of SPA – Whether respondent acted in pari delicto – Contracts Acts.
AKTA PERIHAL DAGANGAN 2011(AKTA 730)
Sale and purchase agreement – Illegality – Allegation of – Whether consequently, financing agreement signed by appellants with respondents void and of no effect – Whether duty on respondents as loan providers to ensure SPA free from legal infirmities – Whether SPA and financing agreement two distinct and separate contracts – Whether finance agreement valid regardless of alleged illegality of SPA – Whether respondent acted in pari delicto – Contracts Acts.
Banishment Repeal Bill Get this bulletin as email by going to http: Parole evidence rule – Oral testimony contradicting documentary evidence – ‘Search-list’ tendered by prosecution in drug case – Whether such document search-list covered by parole evidence rule – Time of raid stated in search-list contradicted by police officer’s oral testimony in court – Whether parole evidence rule applies to all documents – Evidence Acts.
Contract – Breach – Accrual of cause of action – Action against housing developer for delay in completion of house – Claim for damages – Whether claim time-barred – Whether Housing Tribunal erred in allowing claim – Limitation Acts.
Place – Kampung Sungai Labu. Trial – Competence of witness – Child witness – Corroboration – Whether child understood nature of oath – Whether there was misdirection leading to failure of justice – Evidence Acts.
Danaharta Urus Sdn Bhd v. Finance No 2 Bill Securities Commission Amendment Act Advance Synergy Capital Berhad.
A few recommendations have been suggested as to improve the lacuna pursuant to the roles and jurisdictions of the enforcement agencies. The paper also will discuss and elaborate the legal issues and hiccups due to halal. Appeal – Conviction and sentence, against – Whether trial judge had considered mandatory requirements of s. Although the implementation and enforcement of halal in Malaysia is seen as comprehensive, the issues on weakness and lameness of the agencies are still being debated especially matters related to procedures and conflict of jurisdictions.
Duty of court – Court to give effect to statute regardless of consequences – Whether court has power to fill gaps – Tribunal’s jurisdiction pursuant to s. Unique Creations Sdn Bhd v. Ace Ina International Holdings Ltd v.